Lindsey And Barge Continue Charter School Debate

By Edward Lindsey

Superintendent Barge:

I appreciate your response e mail and I am copying my GOP caucus and others since they also received my first sharp rebuke to you earlier this week.  Quite frankly, however, despite your protestations, you simply cannot match up your present stated position in your e mail today with your past conduct in this area.  I also sharply disagree with the merits of your arguments.

You were not an education novice who campaigned in 2010 by actively seeking out support from charter school advocates and indicated “strong” support for state created charter schools.  You are an experienced educator who was well versed on the history of the state supported charter school issue and fully understood at that time the arguments for and against — most of which being the same arguments we are hearing today.

Furthermore, this issue returned to a boil again shortly after you took office with the Supreme Court decision in the spring of 2011 striking down much of HB 881. In response, those of us in the legislature and the executive branch worked closely with both advocates and critics of state funded charter schools for a year to answer concerns and fashion a coalition to pass the constitutional amendment in the legislature. We also worked to maintain funding of existing state created charter schools with the help of your department.

As part of that effort, we also worked extensively throughout the process with representatives from your Department of Education for information and guidance. Throughout this long drawn out process, you never raised opposition to the proposals, voiced fiscal concerns, opposed the continued funding of existing state funded charter schools, or otherwise indicated a change of heart.

This history is what led to my blunt rebuke of your actions earlier this week.

Turning to the merits of your newly minted position,  I share your stated concerns for the 1.6 million public school students in this state and the 11,000 public school teachers.  Let me start of by reminding you that charter schools are public schools, charter school students are public school students, and charter school teachers are public school teachers.

Regrettably, there have been cuts in state spending on education since the beginning of the Great Recession in 2008 – as with every other state in this country.  Nevertheless, education has seen some of the smallest cuts of any area in our state budget.  Our teachers are still the highest paid in the Southeast and after adjusting for cost of living among the highest paid in the nation.  Overall funding per pupil in Georgia is also the second highest in the southeast.

The status quo on education in Georgia is unacceptable.  The overall graduation rate in Georgia hovers in the mid 60% range and half of the students who come from low income households drop out before graduating high school.  In my household, if my children brought home success records like this from school it would be time for serious changes.  It should be same for the Georgia’s education system.

Charter schools are not a silver bullet – there is no one silver bullet – but they are a critically needed tool in the tool box for education reform.  Confining children to low performing traditional schools with no hope of an alternative or choice is morally wrong in the 21st century, and under Georgia’s existing state constitution we already have a duty to provide a quality education for every child in Georgia.

I chaired the Charter School Study Committee in 2007 and studied charter schools in Georgia and around the country.  Georgia’s present system has left us far behind other states in progress toward true education reform by virtue of many systems’ refusal to even consider charter schools or by other systems literally fiscally starving them to death.

Our charter school proposal provides a simple pressure relief valve – not a fire hose – by giving parents an alternative path for consideration of a charter school application.  They must still meet rigorous standards for consideration and if they fail to perform as promised they can be shut down.  (Let me know the last time a traditional public school was shut down for poor performance.)

You speak of local control.  I believe the ultimate local control should rest with the parents and the students.  Therefore, I will let you stand with the status quo education bureaucracy.  I stand with the students and their parents who deserve better.

In closing, let me also add that I will work with you on other education issues in the future despite my deep disappointment in your reversal on this matter.

State Representative Edward Lindsey (R-Atlanta)
Georgia House Majority Whip

cc:  Georgia House Republican Caucus

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Charter Schools, Edward Lindsey, Georgia Education, John Barge

5 responses to “Lindsey And Barge Continue Charter School Debate

  1. Kris

    The republicans have degraded our educational system enough over the years that there are plenty of people that don’t understand the true power of the republicans is the elite.

    Fix Georgia’s Education system not replace it!

    Impeach DEAL

  2. GOP

    @ Ed Lindsey’s 2nd letter: “The status quo on education in Georgia is unacceptable. The overall graduation rate in Georgia hovers in the mid 60% range and half of the students who come from low income households drop out before graduating high school. In my household, if my children brought home success records like this from school it would be time for serious changes. It should be same for the Georgia’s education system.”

    Why hasn’t Ed Lindsey worked to fix public schools? Talk about shirking his duty.

  3. Bill

    So many of these questions about why the Republican dominated Georgia General Assembly and Republican Governor Deal (not to mention Republican Representative Ed Lindsey) are pushing so hard for this charter school constitutional amendment and even why Superintendent Barge has now decided to oppose it must be seen through the prism of the right wing’s carefully thought out, ongoing nationwide strategy to privatize public school systems in America (just as they want to privatize Social Security and Medicare.) They clearly see these government-controlled functions as opportunities for incredible profits for the corporate private sector and are therefore incrementally, state by state undertaking legislative and other political efforts to make it happen. This issue in Georgia is just the latest example. Plenty of folks are writing and talking about this. See: “The Right’s School Choice Scheme,” by Rachel Tabachnick: Click here for article: http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v27n3/School_Choice.html Our Republican Governor, our Republican -controlled General Assembly,and, perhaps sad to say, Rep. Ed Lindsey have signed on to support this right-wing agenda which is anti-public schools and therefore not good public policy and not good for our school-aged children. Mr. Barge, at least in this instance, seems to get it, that this “let’s find a way to profit from the schooling of children in America” is not right. Good for him! I wish Ed Lindsey could see this. It’s not about charter schools being just a viable alternative to public schools, a pressure release valve. It’s much more than that; it’s the product of the “education reform” thinking and strategy of the Koch brothers’ AFP, Betsy Devos’s AFC, the Family Research Council, and ALEC. Kudos to Superintendent Barge for putting the children first and telling these four extremist organizations to stuff it.

  4. B Boy

    Hollowing-out the public school system is all about Republican job creation. By insuring a permanent under-class in this country susceptible to working long hours for low wages and no benefits, the job creaters can avoid off-shoring menial work with the language and other attendant disadvantages to doing that, and possibly derive greater profit. Destroying the unions, relaxing the child labor laws, etc. all go hand-in-hand with this concept of “job creation”.

  5. TD

    Here are reasons why we need education reform, something we will not see from within. I am sorry if your narrow red curtain brain can not absorb these statistics.

    Yes, we need reform. WE NEED VOUCHERS. This Constitutional amendment does not do anything to reform education. All it does is to take away the power from the voters and gives it to a panel of unelected commission. BTW: How can you tell us the members of this commission is going to be filled by “qualified” members? Is the currently appointed Board of regents all qualified to run the colleges? Is the current appointed State BOE filled with qualified individuals?