Monthly Archives: June 2015

Gov. Deal’s Education Reform Commission pushes back on school funding

Lawmakers on Gov. Nathan Deal’s Education Reform Commission are pushing back against a key concept in his plan to change the way education is funded in Georgia.

Deal wants to streamline the decades-old formula that distributes state tax proceeds to school districts. It uses complicated calculations that consider details like the number of years teachers have been on the job or the level of formal education obtained.

But at a meeting Thursday, many members of the commission’s funding committee — a hand-picked panel that includes members of the Georgia General Assembly — said they wanted to keep the present formula, which rewards districts that maintain teaching staffs with lots of training and experience.

“There’s no way not to have a huge impact, and in some cases, a crippling impact, on individuals and school districts if we don’t,” said Rep. Terry England, R-Auburn. Any new formula for distributing money must take into account teacher seniority, said England, the chairman of the House’s budget-writing committee.

Erin Hames, who oversees education policy for Deal, said that if the group doesn’t recommend doing away with paying for training and experience, then “I’m not sure that we’re going to change anything about the way business is done.” She also said research is “pretty clear” that teachers with advanced degrees do no better in the classroom, an assertion that was challenged by at least one committee member.

The group also took aim at another fundamental Deal precept: Charles Knapp, whom Deal selected to lead this commission, has consistently said that the group will not calculate how much it should cost to educate a child. Instead, he has said, the group must figure out how best to divide up whatever money the state chooses to spend on education.

Numerous similar panels under prior governors have tried and failed to tally what it should cost, and Knapp wants to avoid the same fate for this panel.

But lawmakers, including Rep. Tom Dickson, R-Cohutta, pushed back on that, too. “It all starts with what does it cost,” said Dickson, who helps write the House education budget. “You’ve got to know that.”

Sen. Lindsey Tippins, R-Marietta, said the panel should study how much states with similar demographics but better performance are spending on each child. “We need to plagiarize a little bit,” said Tippins, who chairs the Senate Education and Youth Committee.

After the meeting, Tippins said a departure from the current formula that encourages districts to keep teachers on the job, “would create a huge amount of turmoil” and “would punish the districts that have the most stable workforce.”

He said he supports allowing school districts the flexibility to pay teachers regardless of their training and experience but said the state shouldn’t be making such decisions.

“Those are decisions that are a whole lot better made at the local level,” he said.

Teacher advocates were cheered by the new trajectory of Deal’s committee.

“I see it as a bit of a rebellion … a little standing up to the governor because they know the harm it would do to their school districts,” said Tim Callahan, spokesman for the Professional Association of Georgia Educators. “Some of them are showing a little belated spine.”

Until recently, the commission seemed to be following the governor’s orders, he said. That started to change in recent weeks, when the four lawmakers on the funding committee asked Deal to move back the deadline for their recommendation, which was due in August. Deal relented, giving them until Dec. 18. It means he won’t be able to implement a new funding model until the summer of 2017, a year later than he had hoped.

Ty Tagami
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution


Comments Off on Gov. Deal’s Education Reform Commission pushes back on school funding

Filed under Education Reform Commission, Funding, QBE

Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Ensuring College Affordability

Good morning Chairman Alexander, Ranking Member Murray, and distinguished Members of the Committee. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to be here today to share my thoughts on this very important issue.

My name is Beth Akers.  I am a fellow at the Brookings Institution where I carry out research on the topic of higher education, with a particular focus on student loans.  I’ve been engaged in research related to higher education policy since 2008 when, in my role as Staff Economist at the Council of Economic Advisers, I assisted the Department of Education as they quickly implemented the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act.  My testimony is informed by the time that I’ve spent engaged as a researcher in this field, first as a graduate student in the Economics Department at Columbia University and then as a Fellow at the Brookings Institution.


Over the past two decades there’s been a dramatic increase in the share of young U.S. households with education debt.  The incidence has more than doubled, from 14 percent in 1989 to 38 percent in 2013 (Table 1). Not only are more individuals taking out education loans, but they are also taking out larger loans. Among households with debt, the mean per-person debt more than tripled, from $5,810 to $19,341 during the same period (2010 dollars). Median debt grew somewhat less rapidly, from $3,517 to $10,390 (Figure 1, Table 1). Among all households, including those with no debt, mean debt increased eightfold, from $806 to $7,382 (Table 1).

Figure 1. Trends in Education Debt over Time, 1989-2013

Notes: Based on households age 20-40 with education debt.
Source: Akers and Chingos 2014b

Only a trivial number of households had more than $20,000 in debt (per person) in 1989/1992, whereas in 2013, almost one third of those with debt had balances exceeding $20,000 (the change in the distribution is illustrated in Figure 2). The incidence of very large debt balances is greater now than it was two decades ago, but it is still quite rare.  In 2013, seven percent of households with debt had balances in excess of $50,000 and two percent had balances over $100,000 (Akers and Chingos 2014b).

Figure 2. Distribution of Debt, 1989/1992 and 2013

Notes: Based on households age 20-40 with education debt. All amounts are in 2010 dollars.
Source: Akers and Chingos 2014b

The large increases in education debt levels over the last two decades are often attributed to the increases in tuition charged by colleges and universities. There is also evidence that college students are relying more on debt to finance college costs and paying less out-of-pocket (Greenstone and Looney 2013b), suggesting that student behavior is changing in ways that favor loans over other ways of paying for college. Furthermore, there have been shifts in the level of educational attainment and demographic characteristics of the U.S. college-age population that could impact observed student borrowing.  Estimates suggest that roughly one-quarter of the increase in student debt since 1989 can be directly attributed to Americans obtaining more education (both through increased enrollment and increased levels of attainment) while increases in tuition can explain 51 percent of the increase in debt observed during this period (Akers and Chingos 2014a).

Recognizing that the increases in borrowing are driven by multiple factors, some of which are less concerning than others, highlights an important point.  The growth in student loan debt is often discussed as a problem in and of itself. However, to the extent that borrowers are using debt as a tool to finance investments in human capital that pay off through higher wages in the future, increases in debt may simply be a benign symptom of increasing expenditure on higher education.  On the contrary, if these expenditures were spent in ways that don’t pay dividends in the future, then the observed growth in debt may indicate problems for the financial future of borrowers.

Evidence on Affordability

Positive Return on Investment

The most direct way to examine whether borrowers are using debt to finance investments that will pay off is to measure the financial return that their investment will yield in terms of lifetime earnings (relative to what they would have earned if they had not enrolled in a program of higher education) and compare it to the upfront cost of enrollment.  Despite the recent recession, the significant economic return to college education continues to grow, implying that many of these loans are financing sound investments. In 2011, college graduates between the ages of 23 and 25 earned $12,000 more per year, on average, than high school graduates in the same age group, and had employment rates 20 percentage points higher. Over the last 30 years, the increase in lifetime earnings associated with earning a bachelor’s degree has grown by 75 percent, while costs have grown by 50 percent (Greenstone and Looney 2010). There is also an earnings premium associated with attending college and earning an associate’s degree or no degree at all, although it is not as large (Greenstone and Looney 2013a). These economic benefits accrue to individuals, but also to society, in the form of increased tax revenue, improved health, and higher levels of civic participation (Baum, Ma, and Payea 2013).

Studies that seek to identify the causal relationship between education and earnings draw similar conclusions.  A recent study, published by researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 2014, suggested that the financial return on a college degree, when expressed as a rate of return, was 15 percent and had held steady at that level (a historic high) for the previous decade.  A valuable insight from this work is that the return on college has not fallen, despite the growing cost of attendance and stagnant earnings growth across the economy.  This counterintuitive result is driven by the decline of earnings among workers without college degrees (Abel and Deitz, 2014).  These statistics indicating large financial returns on investments in higher education suggest that, for the average student, college will pay for itself in the long run.

Month-to-month Affordability of Student Debt

The long run financial return is an important indicator of affordability, but it could potentially obscure more transient challenges faced by households. For example, an increase in debt may be affordable in the long run but impose monthly payments that squeeze borrowers in the short run, especially early in their careers when earnings are low. However, month-to-month affordability of student debt does not seem to have declined in recent history.  The ratio of monthly payments to monthly income has been flat over the last two decades (Figure 3, Table 2). Median monthly payments ranged between three and four percent of monthly earnings in every year from 1992 through 2013.  Mean monthly payments, which are larger than median payments in each year due to the distribution being right-skewed, declined from 15 percent in 1992 to 7 percent in 2013 (Akers and Chingos 2014b).

Figure 3. Monthly Payment-to-Income Ratios, 1992-2013

Notes: Based on households age 20-40 with education debt, wage income of at least $1,000, and that were making positive monthly payments.
Source: Akers and Chingos 2014

The ratio of monthly payments to monthly income stayed roughly the same over time, on average, at each percentile and for each education category. By this measure, the transitory burden of loan repayment is no greater for today’s young workers than it was for young workers two decades ago. If anything, the monthly repayment burden has lessened.

This surprising finding can be explained in part by a lengthening of average repayment terms during the same period. In 1992, the mean term of repayment was 7.5 years, which increased to 12.5 years in 2013. This increase was likely due primarily to loan consolidation, which increased dramatically in the early 2000s (Department of Education 2014, S-16). Loans consolidated with the federal government are eligible for extended repayment terms based on the outstanding balance, with larger debts eligible for longer repayment terms.  Average interest rates also declined during this period, which would also lower monthly payments (Table 3).

In order to appreciate how much of a burden monthly payments place on households, it’s useful to compare student debt payments to other household expenses.  In Figure 4 average monthly student loan payment (based on data from 2010) is plotted together with the average monthly expenditure in each major consumption category (this data comes from the 2012 Consumer Expenditure Survey, which is administered by the Bureau of Labor Statistics).  The largest categories of monthly consumption expenditure are housing ($1,407), transportation ($750) and food ($588).  Monthly student loan payments are relatively small compared to these expenses, and at $242, are closer in scale to monthly spending on entertainment ($217), apparel ($145) and health care ($296).  There is relatively little variation in monthly loan payments (due to consolidation with longer repayment terms for larger debts) (Akers 2014a).

Figure 4. Average Monthly Expenditures and Student Loan Payments

Data: 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances and 2012 Consumer Expenditure Survey
Source: Akers 2014a

Student Debt is a Poor Indicator of Economic Hardship  

It might seem reasonable to be most concerned about the plight individuals with large outstanding student loan balances, but evidence suggests that these individuals may not be faring any worse than households with smaller balances or no student debt at all.  The highest rates of financial distress, as indicated by late payments on household financial obligations, are seen among households with the lowest levels of student loan debt.  Households with large debts tend to have higher levels of educational attainment and earnings, on average, and miss bill payments less often.  Among households with outstanding education debt in the lowest quartile of the debt distribution ($0 – $3,386), 34 percent report having made a late payment on a financial obligation in the past year compared with 26 percent of households with education debt in the highest quartile (≥$18,930).  Households with student loan debt do not show indications of financial distress more often than households without student loan debt (Akers 2014b).


This body of evidence contradicts the notion that a crisis of college affordability exists on a macro level.  However, it is undeniable that many individuals and households are facing serious economic hardship that can be explained completely or in part by their spending on higher education.  Like any other investment, the returns to higher education are not guaranteed.  While the average student will see a large financial return on the dollars they spend on higher education, some students will find that their investment won’t pay off.  We can reduce the frequency of this occurrence by ensuring that students have the information and resources they need in order to make good decisions about college enrollment.  For instance, a national level data base that reports earnings by institution would succeed in helping student to avoid enrolling at institutions that do not have a track record of success.  This would succeed in creating more institutional accountability without additional government intervention.

An additional way to improve outcomes for students is to simplify the federal lending program both on the front end, with the menu of services, and also on the backend with a more streamlined system of repayment.  Recent work on this issue has revealed that students have relatively little understanding of their financial circumstances while they are enrolled in college.  About half of all first-year students in the U.S. seriously underestimate how much debt they’ve taken on.  Even more concerning is the fact that among all first-year students with federal student loans, 28 percent report having no federal debt and 14 percent report that they have no debt at all (Akers and Chingos 2014c).  Removing the complexity of the federal aid system could potentially succeed in making it easier for students to comprehend their circumstances and to make better informed decisions.

However, some of the uncertainty about the payoff of college is unavoidable.  For example, some students will invest in developing skills that will ultimately become obsolete due to unanticipated technological or policy innovation.  It’s important that the government provide insurance against these types of occurrences both for the sake of ensuring individual welfare and also to discourage debt aversion among potential students.  Income driven payment programs, like the ones currently in place for the federal student lending program, are the appropriate tool for providing a safety net to borrowers.

In sum, college is affordable in the sense that on average it will pay for itself in the long run with heightened wages.  However, to ensure that college is universally affordable ex-post, it’s necessary to maintain a robust system of income driven repayment such that students are insured against their investment not paying off.  Lastly, we need to ensure that both the system of federal lending and the safety nets that exist to support it are simple enough that the benefits of these policy innovations can be fully realized.


Jaison R. Abel and Richard Deitz, “Do the Benefits of College Still Outweigh the Costs?” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Current Issues in Economics and Finance, vol. 20, no. 3 (2014), available at

Elizabeth Akers and Matthew M. Chingos. 2014a.“Is a Student Loan Crisis on the Horizon?” Brown Center on Education Policy, Brookings Institution, available at

Elizabeth Akers and Matthew M. Chingos. 2014b. “Student Loan Update: A First Look at the 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances.” Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy, Brookings Institution, available at

Elizabeth Akers and Matthew M. Chingos. 2014c. “Are College Students Borrowing Blindly?” Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy, Brookings Institution, available at

Elizabeth Akers. 2014a. “They Typical Household with Student Loan Debt.” Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy, Brookings Institution, available at

Elizabeth Akers, 2014b. “How Much is Too Much? Evidence on Financial Well-Being and Student Loan Debt.” Washington, DC: Center on Higher Education Reform, American Enterprise Institute, available at

Sandy Baum, Jennifer Ma and Kathleen Payea. 2013. “Education Pays, 2013.” Washington, DC: The College Board, available at

Department of Education. 2014. “Student Loans Overview: Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Proposal.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (accessed June 13, 2014).

Michael Greenstone and Adam Looney. 2010. “Regardless of the Cost, College Still Matters.” Brookings on Job Numbers blog, October 5.

Michael Greenstone, and Adam Looney. 2013a. “Is Starting College and Not Finishing Really that Bad?” Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Hamilton Project, available at

Michael Greenstone, and Adam Looney. 2013b. “Rising Student Debt Burdens: Factors behind the Phenomenon.” Brookings on Job Numbers blog, July 5, available at



Beth Akers headshot
Beth Akers
Fellow, Governance Studies,Brown Center on Education Policy

Comments Off on Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Ensuring College Affordability

Filed under College

Why Parents Avoid Public Schools

Families that benefited from public tax dollars for their private school tuition explained in a recent survey why they opted against public school, and academics was not the top reason.

Instead, more than half of respondents to a survey pointed to better student discipline as their number one reason for choosing an alternative to public schools, according to the results published by the Georgia GOAL Scholarship Program, an organization that collects donations and distributes them to schools.

Taxpayers can donate money and recoup their largess via state tax credits, up to an aggregate cap of $58 million this year. Applications surpassed that cap on the first day of eligibility, an indication of demand. Georgia GOAL and other advocates are pushing for an increase of the cap.

The group made its case to members of Gov. Nathan Deal’s Education Reform Commission last week. This week, Georgia GOAL provided The Atlanta Journal-Constitution a copy of its report, which summarized the results of a survey of scholarship recipients. Since implementation of the 2008 Education Expense Credit law and through December, Georgia GOAL has distributed 16,689 scholarships to 8,363 students.

Parents of some of those students responded to the survey. Their answers to the question of why they chose private school had less to do with the quality of teachers or curriculum than basic issues, such as the learning environment and the amount of individual attention given.

Taxpayers can donate money and recoup their largess via state tax credits, up to an aggregate cap of $58 million this year. Applications surpassed that cap on the first day of eligibility, an indication of demand. Georgia GOAL and other advocates are pushing for an increase of the cap.

The group made its case to members of Gov. Nathan Deal’s Education Reform Commission last week. This week, Georgia GOAL provided The Atlanta Journal-Constitution a copy of its report, which summarized the results of a survey of scholarship recipients. Since implementation of the 2008 Education Expense Credit law and through December, Georgia GOAL has distributed 16,689 scholarships to 8,363 students.

Parents of some of those students responded to the survey. Their answers to the question of why they chose private school had less to do with the quality of teachers or curriculum than basic issues, such as the learning environment and the amount of individual attention given.

By Ty Tagami
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Comments Off on Why Parents Avoid Public Schools

Filed under Georgia Education

6 Things High School Grads Need to Do Before Leaving for College

Your last high school prom is over and you’re counting down the days till graduation. Some of you may have even already graduated. Yes, freedom and plans for a fun-filled summer are just around the corner.  Before you know it, you’ll be loading up your belongings in the family minivan and heading off to college. You’re so ready, right? Well, maybe not. Here are some tips for things to do this summer before you head off to college.

1. Downsize, Get Organized & Learn How to Do Your Own Laundry

You’re not going to be able to take your whole closet and every cherished belonging with you to the dorm.  Start downsizing now and make a list of all the things you’ll need to take with you. A clean and tidy space will make things a lot more manageable. Most likely you’ll go home a time or two on break and you can swap out things that you don’t need for things that you do. But, in between those trips home, you’ll need to learn how to do laundry. Those whites can turn into some interesting colors and transform into a smaller size if you don’t know your way around a washer and dryer.

2. Understand Your Financial Situation

Each family’s situation is different – make sure you understand what your family may or may not be able to contribute. You should’ve already applied for financial aid.  If not, you need to complete the 2015-16 Free Application For Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) ASAP! Make sure you list on the application the school code of the college you plan to attend so your information is sent to that school. If you still haven’t decided it’s best to list any school you think you may attend. The financial aid office will then notify you of any financial aid you might be eligible for.  Know what each of those types of aid is and in what order you should accept them.  Visit for information on planning and paying for college. Do you have enough money to pay for school? Will you need to work part-time? Make a budget and know what you can spend on certain things.

3. Get a Good Calendar and Prepare for a Whole New World of Time Management

One of the biggest challenges for a lot of you will be time management. When you head off to college, you won’t have somebody there to wake you up, make you breakfast and send you out the door in clean clothes with completed homework in hand. Set yourself up early with a class schedule (make a course syllabus your new best friend) and a system that works for you.  You need to know deadlines for registration, papers, financial aid, coursework and everything in between.  Your chance of succeeding academically will rapidly evaporate if you don’t manage your time well. You’re worth the investment – manage it well.

4. Craft a Good Resume and Learn How to Network

No, don’t wait until you’re approaching college graduation to write a cover letter and resume, you need one now. Having a compelling and professional resume and cover letter is vital to applying for part-time jobs, internships, etc. You might want to also consider changing your email address. Employers probably won’t be impressed with an email address like  Work experience can be just as important as good grades when looking for jobs after college graduation. Internships not only provide you with knowledgeable experiences in your field, but they also provide great networking opportunities.  Don’t settle in and nest, put yourself out there and go to as many networking events as possible.

5. Embrace Coupons and Master the Art of a Good Deal

Another difficult thing to learn is skipping those unnecessary splurges. Yes, I know it’s all about YOLO but you need to embrace BOGO. Coupons aren’t just for stay at home moms anymore.  Scoring deals whether in newspapers, magazines or with online sites like Groupon and Living Social it’s easier than ever.  But don’t get so caught up in the deals that you buy vouchers for things you end up not using.  That can cost rather than save you money. Save those splurges for when you score a great “Buy One Get One” free or other greatly discounted offer. Ask about student discounts and if available, a student advantage card.  Start practicing this summer.  It’ll impress your friends and it’ll be a little more money in your pocket when you get to campus. Another great way to save money is buying used textbooks rather than new. Search sites like, Amazon, and TextbookRush to name a few.  If you buy new and then resell them back to the college bookstore check online sites first for what they’re worth.  College bookstore buy back rates are sometimes as low as 10% of what you paid for it new. Lots of students are also renting textbooks on sites like

6. Learn How to Keep You and Your Things Safe

Yes, you need to remember to lock your dorm room and place that lock on your laptop. Losing your laptop can wreak havoc on your studies and a theft due to an unlocked door can also ruin your relationship with your roommate. Start practicing being more aware of your surroundings and keeping yourself safe. Program your school’s campus security number into your phone.  You never know when you might need it. Safety also applies to protecting your social security number, usernames and passwords. Your social security number is one of the main identifiers when checking on things like financial aid, grades, and registering for classes.  Make sure all your passwords and important numbers are not on a post-it-note on your desk.  Store them in a secure place.  Not protecting your identity and important information can have lasting long-term effects on your ability to get a job and apply for credit.

Congratulations on a job well done and making the decision to advance your education!

Comments Off on 6 Things High School Grads Need to Do Before Leaving for College

Filed under College, High School Graduation